Asana gained access to a $150 million credit line but did not borrow from it, and used cash to repay its old line. The new line is secured and brings fees and borrowing limits, so the filing does not clearly change its outlook.
The new line gives Asana access to cash if it needs it, but it borrowed nothing when the line began. Asana also used cash to clear its previous credit agreement. The new borrowing carries interest and fees, is backed by company assets, and limits some company actions. These facts point in different directions, so the filing alone does not change the outlook.
Wells Fargo joined as an agent, lender, and arranger on Asana’s credit line. The filing reports no borrowing or bank-specific income, so it does not show a clear change to Wells Fargo’s outlook.
MUFG joined as a lender, agent, and arranger on Asana’s credit line. The filing reports no borrowing or bank-specific income, so it does not show a clear change to MUFG’s outlook.
Follow Asana, Inc. (ASAN) free. When we publish a story about it, you get the plain-English explanation as an alert.
Get alerts for ASAN